Scotus News
By Amy Howe
on 10th February 2025
16:12
The March session runs March 24 to April 2. (Katie Barlow)
The Supreme Court’s Argument Session in March will include a dispute over a congress voice card that created another majority -black district in Louisiana, a challenge for an accessibility program from the Federal Communications Commission in which the judges have been asked to revive the so -called “Nondelegation -Doctrin” and The review of a decision made by Wisconsin Supreme Court, who rejects efforts from Catholic charities to seek an exemption from the state’s unemployment tax.
The judges released the calendar for their marching session on Monday, only two working days after the rejected Trump administration’s request to put the orientation into three cases in which it intends to see another look at the rules, agency provisions or actions at the center of the disputes. Two of these three cases – EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining and Oklahoma v. Epa – is now scheduled for argument in March. (The third case, Diamond Alternative Energy v. EPAis not yet planned for argument.)
The argument session in March begins on March 24 and ends on April 2nd. During this time, the judges will hear arguments in nine cases over six days.
Here is a complete list of the cases set for argument during the session of the marchergument:
Louisiana v. Callais (Consolidated with Robinson v. Callais) (March 24) -a challenge for a lower court’s decision to crack down a map that created another majority-black congress district in the state.
Riley v. Bondi (March 24) -A Dispute about issues relating to the 30-day deadline for seeking a review of a decision from the Board of Immigration Appeals that refuses the detention of deportation.
EPA v. Calumet Shreveport Refining (March 25) – Whether challenges from a group of small oil refineries to EPA’s denial of their requests for exceptions to the requirements imposed by the Clean Air Act’s sustained fuel standards, lawsuits in the US appeal of the District of Columbia circuit.
Oklahoma v. Epa (Consolidated with Pacificorp v. EPA) (March 25) -Whether EPA’s denial of states’ plans to implement national air quality standards in accordance with Clean Air Act’s “Good Neighbor” determination can only be brought into the DC Circuit.
FCC v. Consumer Research (Consolidated with Shlb Coalition v. Consumer Research) (March 26) – A challenge for a decision made by the US appeal for 5th circuit, invalid parts of a FCC program to improve Internet and telephone services in underrated areas. The Court of Appeal decided that the program violated the Constitution by wrongly delegating Congress’s power to FCC and FCC’s power to a private company.
Catholic charities v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission (March 31) – Whether Wisconsin violated the first amendment when it refused a religious organization, a tax exemption that would otherwise be available because the group did not meet the state’s criteria for religious behavior.
Rivers v. Guerrero (31 March) -Whore and under what circumstances the federal law that strictly limits the circumstances in which an inmate can submit another petition for federal relief, prohibits an inmate in seeking to change its original petition while pending under appeal .
Full v. PLO (Consolidated with United States v. PLO) (April 1) – Whether a 2019 law seeking to give us the courts to hear the claims of victims of terrorism against the Palestinian Liberation Organization and the Palestinian Authority violates the fifth change guarantee of fair treatment.
Kerr v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic (April 2) – Whether a woman in South Carolina can bring a lawsuit that challenges this state’s decision to end Planned Parenthood’s participation in her Medicaid program.
This article was originally published on Howe on the field.
