Emergency call
By Amy Howe
On February 27, 2025
11:52
The Court of Court rejected the government’s request last week to allow the temporary fixing decision to run out. (Thomas Hawk via Flickr)
The Trump administration on Wednesday repeated its request for the Supreme Court to lift an order of a federal judge in Washington, DC, who directed President Donald Trump to temporarily reintroduce the leader of an independent federal agency tasked with protecting warners from retaliation.
Last week, the judges refused to freeze the order of US district judge Amy Berman Jackson, instead of leaving the Trump administration’s request on wait until her order expired on February 26. But Jackson on Wednesday stretched the order until March 1st. Showing lawyer Sarah Harris then came to court and repeated her request for justice to intervene.
A lawyer for Hampton Delling, the head of the Special Counsel Office, called on the judges to keep the government’s request in wait until March 1st. At that time, he claimed, there will no longer be a living controversy about the placement of lifting Jackson’s original order, and the losing side can appeal to the US appeal of the District of Columbia Circuit.
The Office of Special Counsel was set up to protect the federal government employees from activities banned in the federal workforce, including retaliation. According to the law establishing the agency, the office of the office can only be removed by the president of “inefficiency, neglect of duty or malfeasance in office.”
Then President Joe appointed Biden Delling to earn a five-year period as head of the office in 2024. After he was fired in an e-mail on February 7, which did not specify the cause of his dismissal, Delling went to court to challenge his firing.
On February 12, Jackson issued a temporary restriction order that reintroduced dals for 14 days. When the DC Circuit decided that it lacked the power to weigh on Jackson’s order because temporary restriction orders are generally not appealable, Harris came to the Supreme Court. She argued that the judges could review the order because it “deeply penetrates the core problems of the executive branch” by violating the president’s ability to remove senior officials.
But in a short order on February 21, the judges instead chose to put the government’s request on wait – where he left the dals in place as head of the office of special adviser – until Jackson’s order ran out on Wednesday, February 26.
After a hearing on Wednesday, Harris explained, Jackson expanded faith until Saturday, March 1 to give her more time to consider the panties filed by both sides and prepared an opinion. “Meanwhile,” Harris Justices told, “The damage to the executive branch of” Jackson’s order “has become even more concrete,” as the office of special adviser has brought a case to contest the Trump administration’s layoffs by several test employees. “In short,” she concluded, despite Trump’s efforts to remove him from Embed, Delling “Exercises performing power over the chosen director’s objections to stop employment decisions made by other executive agencies.”
Joshua Matz, a lawyer for Delling, told the judges that Delling “has no objection to this court that keeps the government’s application in accordance for three days.” When Jackson acts on March 1, he observed, her temporary restriction order will “be dissolved” immediately “, which gives the government’s request to lift it. The losing side can then appeal Jackson’s decision, noted Matz, “presumably starting in the” DC Circuit.
This article was originally published on Howe on the field.
