The recent attempt to impose the wearing of the veil at the bar training school reveals the assumed Islamist proselytism of certain religious communities within the judicial institution. More and more incidents are thus emerging, unacceptable breaches that damage our profession and our republican justice. Today, they appear on the training benches of future lawyers. Tomorrow, it is the clerks and the magistrates of the seat and the parquet floor who will be targeted.
This is why, faced with this dangerous progression of the religious fact within our ranks, we, lawyers and auxiliaries of justice, speak up before it is too late. As the last ramparts of freedom, we cannot resolve to let acts of religious activism multiply, which are harmful to our profession and ultimately, for litigants. If we welcome the unequivocal words of the President of the Paris Bar recalling in 2015 that “wearing the robe is obviously exclusive of wearing any distinctive religious sign”each bar is a regulator and we fear that the situation will evolve according to incidents and particular decisions, as well as by the lack of courage or the abandonment of the authorities.
Obligation of neutrality
To accept the wearing of the veil within our institution would be to accept that religion takes precedence over the work of justice. We cannot allow such a symbol. Only the wearing of the dress must prevail, symbol of authority, neutrality and dignity of justice, values common to the people of the palace. Only the wearing of the robe guarantees the unity of all the servants of justice. Only the wearing of the dress transcends us. Fiercely independent, we lawyers are strictly opposed to the wearing of a religious symbol which undoubtedly constitutes a manifestation of dependence.
“The independence of our profession is at stake. The independence of the judiciary is at stake. »
We, lawyers, demand to maintain justice that guarantees everyone the possibility of being judged in an enclosure preserved from religious incursions. We lawyers do not want a communitarian, obscurantist justice. We lawyers do not want veiled justice. We, lawyers, solemnly enjoin the Conseil national des barreaux, under its competence to draw up national rules of procedure, and in order not to leave the decision to prohibit the wearing of the veil by a lawyer, to integrate the ethical obligation of religious neutrality. The independence of our profession is at stake. The independence of the judiciary is at stake.
Signature :
AIDAN Norbert, Bar of Marseille
BALLING Louis, Paris Bar
BONO Sébastien, Paris Bar
BRETZ Ariane, Paris Bar
CAILLIEZ Louis, Bar of Paris
CAMPOCASSO Sylvie, Bar of Marseille
CELLIER Roxane, Paris Bar
CHABERT Patrick, Bar of Rouen (former President)
CONESA Camille, Paris Bar
COTTERET Brice, Paris Bar
CUINAT Pierre, Dijon Bar (honorary lawyer) DE MONTBRIAL Thibault, Paris Bar
DE VILLELE Ludovic, Paris Bar
DEMARCQ Guillaume, Bar of Amiens
DRAI Rémi-Pierre, Paris Bar
EL HAITE Najwa, Paris Bar
FATIMI Lara, Paris Bar
FLECHER Henri, Bar of Toulon
HENRIQUET Pascale, Bar of Bordeaux (honorary lawyer)
HUGONIE Jean-Marc, Paris Bar (honorary lawyer)
JOVANOVIC Anne, Paris Bar
LAVAL Michel, Paris Bar
MANUEL Paula, Paris Bar
MARGUET Bruno, Paris Bar
MARTINEZ Jean, Bar of Marseille
MASSON Caroline, Hauts-de-Seine Bar
MICHEL Brice, Paris Bar
OBADIA Sophie, Paris Bar
PONS Frédérique, Paris Bar
POUJOL Kevin, Paris Bar
PY Aurélien, Grenoble Bar
ROUVIER Gilles, Bar of Paris
SAMSON Emélie, Paris Bar
SAUVAGE Nicolas, Paris Bar
TEITGEN Francis, Paris Bar (former President)
TESTU Hugues, Paris Bar
TOPALOFF Sylvie, Paris Bar
VALENTIN Caroline, Paris Bar
VIOTTOLO Agnès, Paris Bar
WEILL-RAYNAL Aude, Paris Bar